Invesco QQQ Trust (Nasdaq-100) against Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (Nasdaq-100) — fees, long-horizon total returns, holdings overlap, and sector tilt, side by side.
| QQQ | QQQM | SPREAD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD (cumulative) | +16.9% | +16.9% | -0.03 pp |
| 1Y CAGR | +24.8% | +24.8% | -0.05 pp |
| 3Y CAGR | +25.7% | +25.8% | -0.07 pp |
| 5Y CAGR | +14.4% | +14.5% | -0.08 pp |
| 10Y CAGR | +20.7% | — | — |
| Since inception CAGR | +10.8% | +17.1% | -6.31 pp |
Total return: dividend- and split-adjusted daily closes (distributions reinvested). Spread is QQQ minus QQQM. QQQ since-inception measured from first available bar March 10, 1999. QQQM since-inception measured from first available bar October 13, 2020. Since-inception spans differ — compare that row with care.
| QQQ | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Invesco QQQ Trust | Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF |
| Category | Large Growth | Large Growth |
| Style | Passive | Passive |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.15% |
| Assets (AUM) | $452.8B | $97.1B |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 0.46% |
| Avg volume (3-mo) | 42.2M | 3.7M |
| Inception | March 10, 1999 | October 13, 2020 |
| Benchmark proxy | Nasdaq-100 | Nasdaq-100 |
QQQM costs 0.03 pp less per year — about $3.00 per $10,000 invested.
| Shared holding | QQQ | QQQM | MIN |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 8.04% | 8.03% | 8.03% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 7.51% | 7.50% | 7.50% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.71% | 5.71% | 5.71% |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 4.83% | 4.83% | 4.83% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 4.24% | 4.24% | 4.24% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.55% |
Expense ratios verified against issuer fact sheets. Dividend yield is trailing 12-month distributions divided by price, as reported by the fund data provider.
| 3.54% |
| 3.54% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc Class A | 3.43% | 3.43% | 3.43% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc Class C | 3.22% | 3.22% | 3.22% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.05% | 3.05% | 3.05% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc Class A | 2.73% | 2.73% | 2.73% |
Sum of min(weight in each fund) across shared tickers — the standard fund-overlap measure. Computed on the top 25 holdings each fund reports, so it is a lower bound; the coverage figures show how much of each fund those top holdings represent.