US large-cap value ETFs
SCHV vs MGV.
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value) against Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (CRSP US Mega Cap Value) — fees, long-horizon total returns, holdings overlap, and sector tilt, side by side.
Performance · total return
Daily bar history for this pair isn’t loaded yet — returns will appear once the nightly ingest covers both funds.
Fund facts
| SCHV | MGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund |
| Category | Large Value | Large Value |
| Style | Passive | Passive |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.07% |
| Assets (AUM) | $15.9B | $13.3B |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 1.86% |
| Avg volume (3-mo) | 3.4M | 247K |
| Inception | December 11, 2009 | December 17, 2007 |
| Benchmark proxy | S&P 500 | S&P 500 |
SCHV costs 0.03 pp less per year — about $3.00 per $10,000 invested.
Expense ratios verified against issuer fact sheets. Dividend yield is trailing 12-month distributions divided by price, as reported by the fund data provider.
Holdings overlaptop-25 holdings · coverage SCHV 21.6% · MGV 29.6%
16.4%of portfolio weight overlaps7 shared of top 10
| Shared holding | SCHV | MGV | MIN |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 4.02% | 6.14% | 4.02% |
| BRK-BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Class B | 2.83% | 3.32% | 2.83% |
| JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co | 2.75% | 3.86% | 2.75% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 1.94% | 2.89% | 1.94% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp | 1.76% | 2.67% | 1.76% |
| WMTWalmart Inc |
Sector tilt SCHV MGV
Financial Services18.7% / 23.1%-4.4pp
Technology22.9% / 18.1%+4.8pp
Healthcare11.2% / 16.7%-5.5pp
Industrials
More us large-cap value etfs
ALAN GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE · alanglobalintelligence.comreturn history unavailable · fund facts · issuer-verified · holdings · fund data provider
Compare any two funds in ALAN
The interactive tool takes any pair, adds total-vs-price toggles, and saves comparisons to your workspace.
For information and research only. Not investment advice. ALAN does not place trades or execute orders. Figures come from the sources shown and can lag the market; verify independently before making decisions. Past performance is not predictive of future results.